Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Kimberly Birrell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Birrell analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Kimberly Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hibino 2 - 1 Birrell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 45.35% of points on their second serve, while Birrell has won 43.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 53.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Birrell has won 53.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.09% and 40.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 53.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birrell has saved 53.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 50% of matches played (W/L 32/ 32), with Birrell winning 55.71% (W/L 39/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55). Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 145/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11), where as Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Hibino winning 2 times and Birrell being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Hibino winning 5 and Birrell winning 3. The last match between Hibino and Birrell was at the Jiangxi Open - Nanchang, 18-10-2023, Second, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Birrell have played a deciding set 2 times, with Hibino winning 1 times and Birrell 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 1, and Birrell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.63 while Birrell has played against players with an average rank of 212.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birrell has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 45.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birrell has converted 43.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
95
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
148
Rank
100
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
55% (370-300)
Career Total W/L
54% (198-171)
47% (16-18)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$487,328
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nao Hibino vs Kimberly Birrell For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hibino VS Birrell
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nao Hibino | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 39 | 38 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:16 | 2:7:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (167/255) | 58% (148/254) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (101/167) | 64% (94/148) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (44/88) | 42% (44/106) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (15/31) | 60% (15/25) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (116/254) | 43% (110/255) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Kimberly Birrell
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-1 2-6 6-3 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Nao Hibino
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Kimberly Birrell
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (16/18) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (39/45) | 56% (43/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (372/381) | 52% (374/344) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 36% (5/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 88% (7/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 155 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:28 | 1:50:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.12 | 221.16 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1641/2459) | 64% (1477/2316) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1016/1641) | 63% (926/1477) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (371/818) | 44% (368/839) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (128/280) | 44% (139/319) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1060/2478) | 46% (1077/2359) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) | 57% (4/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 62% (13/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (16/34) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 46% (6/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 26% (19/5) | 31% (16/5) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Nao Hibino
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Bondar
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
9
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Destanee Aiava
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Zarina Diyas
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Jule Niemeier
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Sachia Vickery
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Marina Melnikova
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Isabelle Lacy
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Kimberly Birrell
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
3
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
10
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
60 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Birrell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hibino are available here and Birrell photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kimberly Birrell
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
